Timing the invisible
Sample class data (yours will differ — we'll replace it with our own stopwatch results): a scent source opens at the front; each row records when they first smell it. Rate = distance ÷ time, same as the motion unit.
| Row | Distance (m) | Time (s) | Rate (m/s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 8 | |
| 2 | 4 | 22 | |
| 3 | 6 | 41 |
-
Compute each row's rate (round to two decimals). Does the smell travel at a constant speed? What happens to the rate as it gets farther from the source?
-
Propose one particle-level reason the smell slows down with distance. Hint: are the scent molecules getting more crowded or more spread out? Are they still colliding?
The 500 m/s paradox
Air molecules at room temperature move at about 500 m/s — faster than a jet. So why did the smell take 41 seconds to cross 6 meters?
-
At 500 m/s with a clear straight path, how long should 6 m take? (time = distance ÷ speed)
-
The smell actually took 41 s. How many times slower is that than the straight-path prediction? (41 ÷ your answer)
-
Resolve the paradox in two sentences, using the words collision and zigzag. (An air molecule collides billions of times per second — it almost never gets to go straight.)
The random walk
One scent molecule's life: flip a coin — heads = one step toward the back row, tails = one step toward the front. Here is one real trial of 10 flips: H T H H T H T T H H
-
Count heads and tails. Net progress = heads − tails = ___ steps toward the back.
-
To be 10 steps back after 10 flips, you'd need every flip to be heads. The chance of one specific run of 10 flips is 1 in 2¹⁰ = 1,024. In one sentence: why does a smell still eventually reach the back row even though each molecule walks randomly?
-
Extension (fast finishers): there are countless molecules. If each has even a small chance of drifting back-row-ward, what happens to the smell as a whole over a minute?
Hot vs. cold
Published data: a drop of food coloring spreads 10 mm through still water. Cold water: 50 s. Warm water: 25 s.
Compute both rates (mm/s). Warm is how many times faster?
-
Particles move faster when they're warmer — that's what temperature is. Use the rates to finish the claim: "The warm water's particles carried the color about ___× faster, evidence that temperature measures particle ___."
Answer key — teachers
Part A
Row 1: 0.25 m/s · Row 2: ≈0.18 m/s · Row 3: ≈0.15 m/s.
- Not constant — the rate drops with distance.
- Scent molecules spread thinner (lower concentration) and keep colliding with air; fewer of them are pushing into new territory per second.
Part B
- 6 ÷ 500 = 0.012 s
- 41 ÷ 0.012 ≈ 3,400× slower
- Each molecule collides constantly and zigzags; almost no path is straight, so the smell's net progress is thousands of times slower than any single molecule's speed.
Part C
- 6 heads, 4 tails → net +2 steps toward the back.
- Most random runs still drift somewhere, and molecules that wander back-row-ward stay there — with countless molecules, some fraction always arrives, and they accumulate (diffusion is one-way overall because there's no smell to send back).
- The smell fills the room — countless random walkers guarantee it, no aiming required.
Part D
- Cold: 0.2 mm/s · Warm: 0.4 mm/s → 2× faster.
- "…about 2× faster … particle speed (energy)."